<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Keyboard? How Quaint!&#8221;&#8230;well, maybe not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>The 1s and 0s of outrageous fortune</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:28:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaise Pascal</title>
		<link>http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaise Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 03:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radiofreetomorrow.org/?p=130#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Sally: &lt;em&gt;I think that we may need to think a bit like the computer&lt;/em&gt;.

We&#039;ve been down that road with handwriting recognition.  The earliest consumer-level handwriting recognition devices tried to recognise human handwriting and mostly failed.  Handwriting recognition didn&#039;t take off in consumer devices until Palm introduced Graffiti, in which the humans had to learn how &quot;think a bit like the computer&quot; and write in a prescribed manner.

However, where is handwriting recognition now?  It&#039;s been 9 Moore-doublings since Graffiti was introduced.   Yet a 512-increase in processing power has not resulted in a corresponding increase in acceptance of handwriting recognition.   I&#039;d go as far as to say that handwriting recognition, Graffiti and all, has been rejected by the market.

I suspect there are parallels to the voice recognition issue as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally: <em>I think that we may need to think a bit like the computer</em>.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been down that road with handwriting recognition.  The earliest consumer-level handwriting recognition devices tried to recognise human handwriting and mostly failed.  Handwriting recognition didn&#8217;t take off in consumer devices until Palm introduced Graffiti, in which the humans had to learn how &#8220;think a bit like the computer&#8221; and write in a prescribed manner.</p>
<p>However, where is handwriting recognition now?  It&#8217;s been 9 Moore-doublings since Graffiti was introduced.   Yet a 512-increase in processing power has not resulted in a corresponding increase in acceptance of handwriting recognition.   I&#8217;d go as far as to say that handwriting recognition, Graffiti and all, has been rejected by the market.</p>
<p>I suspect there are parallels to the voice recognition issue as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berwyn</title>
		<link>http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Berwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 03:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radiofreetomorrow.org/?p=130#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Because typing is difficult for me, I tried VR for a bit.  Was mused that it couldn&#039;t understand simple words like &#039;blue&#039; (glue? flew?), but had no problem at all with &#039;Jararvellir&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because typing is difficult for me, I tried VR for a bit.  Was mused that it couldn&#8217;t understand simple words like &#8216;blue&#8217; (glue? flew?), but had no problem at all with &#8216;Jararvellir&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charissa</title>
		<link>http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Charissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radiofreetomorrow.org/?p=130#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the biggest barrier to computers &amp; speech relates more to culture than anything else.  Maybe that&#039;s just context as you noted above, but a word is not just a word. Words grew out of the culture they were created in (or vice versa I&#039;m not an anthropologist, so maybe this is a chicken-and-egg problem or maybe people more knowledgeable than myself know this already) and to take them out of that culture creates issues. Computers don&#039;t really get those subtle elements, and computers today need to be more &quot;multicultural&quot; than they&#039;re capable of being, and so, until you can program cultural subtleties into a computer, voice recognition is never going to be as great as it seems like it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the biggest barrier to computers &amp; speech relates more to culture than anything else.  Maybe that&#8217;s just context as you noted above, but a word is not just a word. Words grew out of the culture they were created in (or vice versa I&#8217;m not an anthropologist, so maybe this is a chicken-and-egg problem or maybe people more knowledgeable than myself know this already) and to take them out of that culture creates issues. Computers don&#8217;t really get those subtle elements, and computers today need to be more &#8220;multicultural&#8221; than they&#8217;re capable of being, and so, until you can program cultural subtleties into a computer, voice recognition is never going to be as great as it seems like it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://radiofreetomorrow.org/2010/05/03/keyboard-how-quaint-well-maybe-not/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 23:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radiofreetomorrow.org/?p=130#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I think that we may need to think a bit like the computer, in order for it to do what we want; or phrase things with the computer in mind.   Just in dealing with data bases, I find myself needing to anticipate what form a particular Chief Complaint or Medication needs to be asked for.  I know this has to do with who programs it, but that&#039;s true in any case. 

Perhaps the verbal recognition dictation is a start for dealing with the wording piece. They have accent packages for that.  There is a particular cardiologist, who I never thought would be able to dictate to a computer, and yet he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we may need to think a bit like the computer, in order for it to do what we want; or phrase things with the computer in mind.   Just in dealing with data bases, I find myself needing to anticipate what form a particular Chief Complaint or Medication needs to be asked for.  I know this has to do with who programs it, but that&#8217;s true in any case. </p>
<p>Perhaps the verbal recognition dictation is a start for dealing with the wording piece. They have accent packages for that.  There is a particular cardiologist, who I never thought would be able to dictate to a computer, and yet he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
