Archives For author

Now, if I could only actually remember to post this weekly, I’d have a weekly feature! That’d be awesome! Anyway…

This week — today, in fact — brings us two bits of geek news that sort-of peg the WTFBBQ meter, along with some actually fun announcements. No reviews in this installment, however.

Read the rest of this entry »

In which I ramble on about “Encounter at Farpoint”, Star Wars: The Old Republic, and a woman building a TARDIS.

Read the rest of this entry »

My social media use has become quite disarranged in recent months.

I no longer really use LiveJournal. I’ve never used Facebook very heavily. I do use G+ and Twitter quite a bit but those don’t seem to be the best venues to expound on certain kinds of thoughts — good places to link back to, but not good places for the content itself.

So…the question arises…now what?

I have this blog, of course, which I haven’t really done nearly as much with as I want to. It’s not exactly private, so some topics will not belong here, but there are plenty of things I used to rant about all the time that could go here, including, of course, the topics I originally started this blog for: various topics in science fiction and fantasy.

So…assuming anyone at all reads this, what sorts of things would you like to see me babble about?

Some of you may be aware that I have now taken one more step into the realm of Living In the Future. I now work almost entirely out of my home, even though my official home office is in San Francisco. Even better, I’m telecommuting full-time while working for a company that builds solar power plants!

If you’ve surmised that I’m kind-of jazzed by both my new job and my new working environment, you’re correct.

One of the things that most excites me about the this new situation is the prospect of tricking out my working environment to be what I want it to be. This of course has led to a considerable amount of pondering as to exactly what I wanted.

The current thinking runs something like this: Read the rest of this entry »

After a long hiatus, I’m about half-way through writing the next installment in the “Getting Started with Doctor Who” series. Stay tuned!

After giving it some thought, the Tom Baker article is being broken up into three parts: the Sarah Jane years, the Leela years, and Romana years. There’s just too much good material to talk about during this long tenure.

It’s difficult not to think of Tom Baker as being the “definitive” Doctor. Not in the sense he’s the indisputably best one, so much as that it’s difficult to have a prolonged conversation about the classic series without discussing his tenure, or to talk about the various Doctors without comparing ultimately to TB.

There are several reasons for this:

  • He had the longest televised tenure: 7 seasons. With the advent of Big Finish audioplays and the Virgin and later BBC Books novel series, he is not the Doctor who has had the most stories written about him, but in terms of on-screen time, he had both the longest tenure and I believe the most screen time. (Earlier seasons had more episodes per year, so I’m not positive about this).
  • His Doctor was a wide-eyed enthusiast with a commanding presence that immediately dominated a scene or a situation. His mop of curls, huge eyes, manic smile, booming voice, and tall stature all guaranteed he would immediately be memorable. Add to that a few “trademark” touches, like the infamously long multicolored scarf and you create something that even non-fans will recognize instantly.
  • The stories of his era, while not uniformly fantastic, are mostly pretty good, with several moments of true brilliance. While effects were still crude by any standard, the show had reached a level of maturity that meant that the production team knew how to make the most of what they had available to them.
  • The Tom Baker era seemed to avoid some of the formula traps of the past. The Second Doctor is often thought of as the “monster” Doctor, while the Third Doctor is the UNIT Doctor. The Fourth Doctor, however, defies any such categorization. His stories are as likely to involve human(oid) villains as monsters, are only sometimes set on present day Earth, and fall into many genres, including occasionally bordering on outright horror.
  • Tom Baker’s tenure coincided with the BBC getting the bright idea to syndicate the program overseas. Many fans of my generation had their first exposure to the program when first independent commercial stations (in my case, WOR-TV) and then a great many PBS stations began airing the first four years of Tom Baker’s tenure in endless loop. Eventually, the numbers justified expanding the syndication to include the rest of Baker’s tenure, then, more or less in real time, Peter Davison’s, and then finally begin releasing the back catalogue of older stories into the syndication universe. In the meantime, however, many of us had had a groove worn in our brains by repeated viewings of those first four years.

At any rate, just as David Tennant is, at least for the moment, the definitive Doctor of the New Series, Tom Baker is that for the old.

Right…on we go… Read the rest of this entry »

In 1966, it became clear that William Hartnell could not continue to star in the title role of Doctor Who. He loved the job, but he was in increasingly ill health, and and arteriosclerosis (and the resulting diminished blood flow to the brain) meant that his memory was failing. At a time when episodes were taped with as few re-takes as possible because of primitive editing technology (mostly involving scissors and tape!), fluffed lines frequently went out on the air as if it were a live program.

But the program was still popular enough that canceling it seemed like a bad idea. Producer Innis Lloyd hit upon the bold idea of basically recasting the main character. I mean, hell, he was already established as being an alien of some sort; who knows what he can do?!

Once that idea took hold, Lloyd was also determined not to cast a clone of Hartnell, but rather to take the opportunity to strike out in a new direction with the character: a younger actor, more physically active, but still quirky. William Hartnell himself suggested Patrick Troughton for the job, Head of Drama Sydney Newman suggested the “cosmic hobo” personality, and the rest was history.

Troughton also loved the role once he came to it, but he knew from the beginning he didn’t want to stay forever, lest he become typecast. He also found the work schedule grueling. At that time, they were doing 40-44 episodes a year! He chose to limit his involvement to three years, at which point the decision was made to do the same thing all over again: roll the dice, as it were, come up with yet another sort of quirkiness, recast the role, and let her rip.

By then it was 1969, and they also decided it was time to move to colour, which shifted the budget a bit. To cope with that, the came up with a reason to set the story entirely on contemporary Earth for a few seasons. The result radically altered the dynamic of the show, giving it a more mature feel (not least of which because of the shift to almost entirely adult companions and recurring characters, rather than the previous model of having at least one teen) without sacrificing the core of what made the show work. If you’ve seen the new series episode-pair “The Sontaran Strategem” and “The Poison Sky”, you actually have a fair idea of how the UNIT seasons worked.

Anyway, on with the episode recommendations… Read the rest of this entry »

A week or so ago, I found myself posting, first as a comment and then as a separate entry in my LiveJournal, an article enumerating recommendations to a friend as to which episodes of the classic Doctor Who series were the best ones to focus on out of the vast body of material already released on VHS or DVD. For various reasons, that article, while long for an LJ post, was still really a summery and didn’t really go into much depth as to why I as recommending what I was.

Expanding on that theme, however, is a pretty good fit for Radio Free Tomorrow, which I started, after all, as a place to natter endlessly about geeky topics. Except I haven’t been nattering that much lately. So, time to fix that. If you’re interested in getting started with the original Doctor Who series, this guide will give you a good idea of where to start.

Read the rest of this entry »

Go here and watch Ark. All 9 episodes. It won’t take you more than about 45 minutes.

No…really. Right now.

ADDED This is what I get for being late to the party and carefully considering how I feel about an issue. As various comments have stated, the policy has been rescinded before it was ever put into place. Someone got smart.


I haven’t really been doing much gaming, lately, and what I have been doing has been mainly Star Trek: Online. Nevertheless, I have enough World of Warcraft players in my world that I became aware of the advent of RealID pretty much from day one. Most of them seemed pretty happy with it, since, among other things, it enables the ability to chat with people on other servers and other factions. This is a big shift in the social architecture of the game, which previously restricted in-game chat to people on the same server and on the same “side” (Alliance vs. Horde).

But a RealID is an e-mail address, which is Problem Number One. Now, everyone can see a player’s e-mail address. Oh, sure, one can probably cons up a free e-mail address that has nothing to do with them in any other context easily enough, and use that in-game only. A lot of people, however, won’t think about that. None of my friends have. And they probably should have.

But now, Blizzard is insisting on a new policy whereby they will only permit the use of real names in their forums. Since you have to give your real name to create an account (at least, if you’re using a credit card, which most people are, I believe), this is rather difficult to evade, and anyway, if it’s policy, then obvious evasions will probably result in banning.

The intention of this is presumably to suppress so-called “griefers” and others trolls and active criminals, by requiring them to stop hiding behind pseudonyms. However, as Scott Lynch points out, all it’s really going to do is give such people a more target rich environment. People who are intent on causing trouble–whether it be merely social maliciousness like trolling or active criminality–will be the most likely to find canny ways to evade the new rules, while ordinary, law abiding folks who just want to play the game and talk about it with other players without getting harassed or stolen from will have no idea how and no real desire to do so. Because they’re not the ones doing anything wrong!

Scott pretty well enumerates all the reasons why this turns out to be a worse and worse idea the more you think about it, so I won’t belabor it further — go chase the link above.

Meanwhile, I think I will not, after all, be getting back into the game anytime soon as I’d planned.