Archives for category: Unsolicited Opinion

I’m reviving an attempt at a semi-regular feature I did last year. Mainly because this week is an extraordinarily good week to be a geek.

Let’s review…

Last Saturday/Sunday: Doctor Who: “Nightmare in Silver” by Neil Gaiman

Bringing the Cybermen back in an anniversary year doesn’t always work out so well. The classic story Silver Nemesis, for example, was a jumbled mess of a story. Worse, it’s basic beats and themes were almost identical to the same season’s much better Remembrance of the Daleks.

“Nightmare in Silver” isn’t quite the piece of brilliance it could have been, but it’s a much better return to the Cyber-mythos than almost anything the New Series has produced since the “Age of Steel”. I find myself wishing for a copy of Mr Gaiman’s actual, submitted script. I have a great deal of respect for his writing, so I find myself wondering how many of the things that marred “Nightmare in Silver” were insertions or deletions at production time…

But frankly, I want to talk about what worked more than what didn’t. Once again, Doctor Who proves it’s general ability to world-build in a matter of seconds. We know almost nothing about this particular iteration of the Earth Empire (although diehard fans know there have been several), for example, but in a very short time we learn enough. One gets the impression that this Empire is almost-but-not-quite entirely a defense agreement against threats like the Cybermen, for example, in very short order.

The series also proves its ability to reinvent its villains as easily, and as successfully, as it reinvents its main character.  Gaiman manages to capture the two essential elements of the Cybermen: patience and opportunism. Their way is to wait for the right moment — for centuries if necessary — and then pounce. It doesn’t always work out for them, but only because the Doctor so often turns up at the moment they pounce!

From there, however, he spins an entirely new, deadlier iteration of the race. One that can move like lightning when it needs to, and that adapts continually. One might complain about the similarity to the Borg, but of course, the Cybermen originally predate the Borg, and this development is only natural in a cybernetic organism. When the Cybermen were invented in 1966, nobody really knew anything about computer networking or the mania for upgrading that the modern electronic age would create. Now that we know, it’s foolish to expect a truly modern iteration of the Cybermen not to include those features, no matter who else it makes them similar to.

So, yeah, that was a good place to start.

Last Sunday: Commander Hadfield’s Serenade

Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield has become an Internet Celebrity by staying in touch with Earth via social media. Sunday, as he prepared to leave the International Space Station, he regaled us with a cover of David Bowie’s “Space Oddity” (actually…more filk than cover, to be honest). He’s pretty good, too!

Tuesday: Agents of SHIELD trailers pop up

I feel a little bit dirty admitting this, but I think I’m going to have to watch a network television show this fall. Because from both the 30-second and 3-minute trailers that are now circulating, I would say that this series has at least some potential to Not Suck.

Of course, there’s more than a little pressure on this project to Not Suck.

First of all, show-runner Joss Whedon is not exactly Midas, but he does seem to have some idea how to tell a story, most of the time. People expect a lot from him, and now he has to deliver.

Second of all, the Marvel Cinematic Universe, in general, has raised the bar for telling interesting stories about comic book characters on screen. Until now, they only had to deliver once a year, or so, and they had lots of time and money to spend on making it all look spiffy and exciting. Now, they’ll be subject to the exigencies of weekly television. People will be expecting a certain level of “blockbuster” awesomeness that may be very hard to deliver.

And lastly…Coulson Lives. OK, that’s great. I really have no issue with it whatsoever, for the same reason most people don’t: Clark Gregg is a solid actor, Agent Coulson is a great character, and except for the fact that he looked pretty dead in Avengers, he’s the perfect character to lead a team of agents at this point. I don’t really even care how he’s still alive. I don’t care if he’s a robot, a clone, or just secretly has Wolverine’s healing factor.

All I care about is that they don’t waste him with crap scripts. They’ve gone out on this limb, and now it needs to pay off!

Tuesday: Confirmation of Doctor Who Season 8

At the BAFTA awards, Stephen Moffat confirmed there will be an eighth season of the revived series. Internet speculation is rampant about how long he, Matt Smith, or Jenna-Louise Coleman will continue to be involved, but regardless of who’s writing it or who’s starring in it, the series will be back in 2014.

Thursday: Star Trek Into Darkness

I was deeply skeptical of Star Trek (2009) when it was released.

I wound up seeing it no fewer than 13 times in the theaters. So obviously, I’m mostly OK with JJ-Trek, so far.

But the skepticism is still there, honestly. I don’t really like the main rumor of who Benedict Cumberbatch’s character really is (no, no spoiler — you can Google for it yourself if you really want the spoiler). I think it represents a failure of imagination, a missed opportunity, and something of an attempt to one-up the Original Series and OS films by creating a direct point of comparison. I think that’s a huge mistake, and no matter how much I like the film itself once I see it, that disappointment won’t change if the bad guy is who I now think it is.

That said, I am past the point I was at when the rumor first started flying, when I declared that I wouldn’t even see the film once if it turned out to be true. I will see the film. I am prepared to enjoy the film for what it is, even if I wind up criticizing it for what it could have been. I will do everything I can to leave the chip on my shoulder at home, because honestly, in the end, I want to like this movie, and I want them to keep making them — ideally more often than once every four years!

Saturday/Sunday: Doctor Who: “The Name of the Doctor”

Speaking of skepticism…this week’s Season 7 Finale is itching me a bit. No, I haven’t seen it yet. No, I don’t have any problem with its stated premise, nor even if they actually pay it off and tell us some of his Deep Dark Secrets. It’s just that I don’t trust Doctor Who finales to not suck any more!

First of all, I think the New Series has at best a mixed track record with its finales. All too often, the impulse to be “bigger and bolder and better” than the year before results in something that’s just absurdly broken. For example, “The Stolen Earth”/”Journey’s End” comes across like questionable fan-fiction — the sort where you find excuses to mash all your favorite characters together even if they have no reason to even know about each other. The difference, of course, is that the fan writing this fiction was also the show-runner, Russell T. Davies, and he could get away with it.

And then, there’s Stephen Moffat. When he first took over, I was truly looking forward to his tenure, because other things I’d seen him write, I’d enjoyed.

But Mr. Moffat has come to rely entirely too much on the fairy-tale/fantasy aspects of Doctor Who. “Timey Wimey” has become code for “Inexplicable Magic with no rhyme or reason to it.”

Combine these two trends together, and I’m left with some severe trepidation about this Moffat-penned finale, in an anniversary year when he knows he needs to deliver something more than average.

This entire season has marked a second serious attempt to explore the mystery of the Doctor — his past, his name, what makes him who he is. The last time they did it, the series was cancelled before they could pay it off! At the very least, at least this time, we know the series will get to pay it off, and will continue on afterward and have to actually live with the consequences of what it reveals!

And that, even in Moffat’s hands, could be exciting. If they don’t pull back from the brink, if they actually reveal Important Things, then it could mark the same sort of “reinvention” moment that the Time War did for the Revived Series in the first place, a chance to shift the game in such a way that new viewers can come on board at the beginning of Series 8 and have almost a level playing field with old hands. That, in turn, could maybe shake it loose from some of the ruts it’s fallen into!

So I guess, in the end, I’m willing to put up with even a bit of Moffaty incoherence and series-finale bombast if the result is something new and interesting!

[There are spoilers here, more or less up-to-the-minute. This is your only warning.]

OK, yes, it’s been a while since I posted anything here. We all know I’m like that.

Enough meta. Here’s what I want to talk about.

Does anyone remember when the Doctor’s companion was not also a plot device?

If you’ve only ever seen the new series, chances are, you don’t; because for you, the companion almost always always has been a plot device. In the modern series, the “big picture” story is about the Doctor’s companion and the impact s/he has on his life. By contrast, in the classic series, there really wasn’t a ‘big picture” story, and the series was mainly about what happens to existing situations when the Doctor and his companions fall into them.

Let’s review:

Rose: the Bad Wolf, the woman whom the Doctor actually loves with something almost like romantic love.

Captain Jack: the man who can’t be killed, the anchor for the spin-off.

Martha: OK…Martha’s ALMOST what companions used to be. There’s no strange, timey-wimey- stuff around Martha. She’s just a pretty smart person who was in the right place at the right time to stumble into the Doctor’s orbit.

Donna: the Temporary Time Lord

Wilf: The Doctor’s doom.

River Song: Where do I even START on this one, really? She’s almost nothing BUT plot device, which is probably the most disappointing waste of an intriguing character in the history of the series, old or new.

Amy and Rory: Actually, these two start out almost promising. Yes, the whole cracks-in-the-wall thing kinda follows Amy around, but other than that, their first year almost avoids the trap. The second year-and-a-half, however, gets them so entangled with the River Song plot device that they also become plot devices, not people.

And now…Clara. I really, really want to like Clara, but unless something changes in some of the upcoming stories, I’m not sure I can. Oh, I don’t mean Clara-the-character. Clara the character, when we actually see her without any attempt by the writers to shove up our nose how special she is, is interesting enough.

But Clara the plot device is starting to actually make me uncomfortably itchy. Partially because she’s the Latest in as Long Line of plot-device companions; but also because the main effect she seems to be having on the Doctor is to turn him into a creepy, obsessive bastard.

Now, mind you…the Doctor is not a good person. The first thing we ever see him do, back in 1963, is kidnap two school teachers because they’d stumbled upon the TARDIS. Most of the time he seems to have risen above that sort of thing, but every now and then, the fact that he just doesn’t think like a normal, well-adjusted human being, because he’s absolutely none of those things, is made starkly obvious. Sometimes it makes for a good story.

Right now…it’s not.

Right now, the fact that Clara is a Mystery To Be Solved™ is overriding the fact that she’s a person, in terms of how the Doctor treats her. I have no idea what the writers were thinking when they decided to show us that the Doctor wound up stalking her and her family through her childhood, but the end result is that the Doctor is creeping on a little girl on the playground.

[Credit where due: while the scenes bothered me from the first, I didn't think of it in those exact terms until my friend @quasilaur on Twitter made a similar complaint.]

Are the writers trying to demonstrate for us just how alien the Doctor is by showing us the lengths he’ll go to to solve a mystery, even when that mystery is a person? Or have they themselves lost sight of the fact that their characters are supposed to be people first, and plot devices second?

I’m terribly afraid it’s the latter, and if that’s the case, then I suspect Series 7, and the 50th Anniversary, are likely to be very disappointing. at the very least.

 

 

I’ve been thinking about the state of science fiction, these days; science fiction on television in particular, but also, the popular franchises and concepts in SF in general. Thinking in particular on the fact that it’s all so damned bleak and hopeless and pessimistic!

What we need now, frankly, is Star Trek. And not just another movie — although I’m looking forward to the new movie with absurd glee. We need another series. We need a space-opera television series whose premise is simply this: The Future Is Going To Be Awesome!

Read the rest of this entry »

Now, if I could only actually remember to post this weekly, I’d have a weekly feature! That’d be awesome! Anyway…

This week — today, in fact — brings us two bits of geek news that sort-of peg the WTFBBQ meter, along with some actually fun announcements. No reviews in this installment, however.

Read the rest of this entry »

In which I ramble on about “Encounter at Farpoint”, Star Wars: The Old Republic, and a woman building a TARDIS.

Read the rest of this entry »

In order to understand why so many Americans think that affordable health care is a privilege — hell, to understand why so many Americans think that eating is a privilege — you need to go back about 450 years, to the foundation of the Puritan movement, and more to the point, to its theological underpinnings.

Read the rest of this entry »

It’s an open secret that, despite being as avid a student of Tudor history as someone who isn’t actually in academia can claim to be, I kinda like The Tudors, meaning the Showtime series written by Michael Hirst. I freely admit that I like it despite its lack of historical accuracy. I have no illusions on that score, nor had any going in. Hirst is the same man who penned the scripts for Elizabeth, after all, so I already knew what I was getting into. Hirst makes no claims to be writing documentaries, or even docu-dramas. He’s writing dramas guided by historical events, people, and themes.

It’s on the thematic level that Hirst’s work shines best, in my opinion, and comes closest to accuracy, managing to cover a surprising range of issues that were so key to those years, especially the religious issues. It’s also what shows that Hirst actually does understand the period he’s writing about and knows exactly what he’s doing when he deviates from actual historical research, bends the timeline, conflates characters, or simply makes shit up because it fits the coherent narrative of a television series better than real history did (at least, in his opinion). Some people would probably say that makes it worse — that because he knows better, he should do a better job of being accurate — but I’m pretty much OK with it.

No, in the end, there are two broad categories of things about The Tudors that really bother me at all. They can best be summarized that the show is simultaneously too clean, and too dirty. Read the rest of this entry »

After giving it some thought, the Tom Baker article is being broken up into three parts: the Sarah Jane years, the Leela years, and Romana years. There’s just too much good material to talk about during this long tenure.

It’s difficult not to think of Tom Baker as being the “definitive” Doctor. Not in the sense he’s the indisputably best one, so much as that it’s difficult to have a prolonged conversation about the classic series without discussing his tenure, or to talk about the various Doctors without comparing ultimately to TB.

There are several reasons for this:

  • He had the longest televised tenure: 7 seasons. With the advent of Big Finish audioplays and the Virgin and later BBC Books novel series, he is not the Doctor who has had the most stories written about him, but in terms of on-screen time, he had both the longest tenure and I believe the most screen time. (Earlier seasons had more episodes per year, so I’m not positive about this).
  • His Doctor was a wide-eyed enthusiast with a commanding presence that immediately dominated a scene or a situation. His mop of curls, huge eyes, manic smile, booming voice, and tall stature all guaranteed he would immediately be memorable. Add to that a few “trademark” touches, like the infamously long multicolored scarf and you create something that even non-fans will recognize instantly.
  • The stories of his era, while not uniformly fantastic, are mostly pretty good, with several moments of true brilliance. While effects were still crude by any standard, the show had reached a level of maturity that meant that the production team knew how to make the most of what they had available to them.
  • The Tom Baker era seemed to avoid some of the formula traps of the past. The Second Doctor is often thought of as the “monster” Doctor, while the Third Doctor is the UNIT Doctor. The Fourth Doctor, however, defies any such categorization. His stories are as likely to involve human(oid) villains as monsters, are only sometimes set on present day Earth, and fall into many genres, including occasionally bordering on outright horror.
  • Tom Baker’s tenure coincided with the BBC getting the bright idea to syndicate the program overseas. Many fans of my generation had their first exposure to the program when first independent commercial stations (in my case, WOR-TV) and then a great many PBS stations began airing the first four years of Tom Baker’s tenure in endless loop. Eventually, the numbers justified expanding the syndication to include the rest of Baker’s tenure, then, more or less in real time, Peter Davison’s, and then finally begin releasing the back catalogue of older stories into the syndication universe. In the meantime, however, many of us had had a groove worn in our brains by repeated viewings of those first four years.

At any rate, just as David Tennant is, at least for the moment, the definitive Doctor of the New Series, Tom Baker is that for the old.

Right…on we go… Read the rest of this entry »

In 1966, it became clear that William Hartnell could not continue to star in the title role of Doctor Who. He loved the job, but he was in increasingly ill health, and and arteriosclerosis (and the resulting diminished blood flow to the brain) meant that his memory was failing. At a time when episodes were taped with as few re-takes as possible because of primitive editing technology (mostly involving scissors and tape!), fluffed lines frequently went out on the air as if it were a live program.

But the program was still popular enough that canceling it seemed like a bad idea. Producer Innis Lloyd hit upon the bold idea of basically recasting the main character. I mean, hell, he was already established as being an alien of some sort; who knows what he can do?!

Once that idea took hold, Lloyd was also determined not to cast a clone of Hartnell, but rather to take the opportunity to strike out in a new direction with the character: a younger actor, more physically active, but still quirky. William Hartnell himself suggested Patrick Troughton for the job, Head of Drama Sydney Newman suggested the “cosmic hobo” personality, and the rest was history.

Troughton also loved the role once he came to it, but he knew from the beginning he didn’t want to stay forever, lest he become typecast. He also found the work schedule grueling. At that time, they were doing 40-44 episodes a year! He chose to limit his involvement to three years, at which point the decision was made to do the same thing all over again: roll the dice, as it were, come up with yet another sort of quirkiness, recast the role, and let her rip.

By then it was 1969, and they also decided it was time to move to colour, which shifted the budget a bit. To cope with that, the came up with a reason to set the story entirely on contemporary Earth for a few seasons. The result radically altered the dynamic of the show, giving it a more mature feel (not least of which because of the shift to almost entirely adult companions and recurring characters, rather than the previous model of having at least one teen) without sacrificing the core of what made the show work. If you’ve seen the new series episode-pair “The Sontaran Strategem” and “The Poison Sky”, you actually have a fair idea of how the UNIT seasons worked.

Anyway, on with the episode recommendations… Read the rest of this entry »

A week or so ago, I found myself posting, first as a comment and then as a separate entry in my LiveJournal, an article enumerating recommendations to a friend as to which episodes of the classic Doctor Who series were the best ones to focus on out of the vast body of material already released on VHS or DVD. For various reasons, that article, while long for an LJ post, was still really a summery and didn’t really go into much depth as to why I as recommending what I was.

Expanding on that theme, however, is a pretty good fit for Radio Free Tomorrow, which I started, after all, as a place to natter endlessly about geeky topics. Except I haven’t been nattering that much lately. So, time to fix that. If you’re interested in getting started with the original Doctor Who series, this guide will give you a good idea of where to start.

Read the rest of this entry »