I have several post ideas queued up waiting for my brain to reorganize itself after several very stressful weeks, but today I came across an article thanks to Slashdot that I feel a need to comment upon.

The article is entitled, “Rest in Peas: The Unrecognized Death of Speech Recognition“, by a fellow named Robert Fortner. I don’t know who Mr Fortner is, honestly, but that doesn’t matter to me much. I mean, not a lot of people know who I am, either, and that doesn’t keep me from venturing opinions I hope people will find interesting

ANYWAY, the gist of Mr Fortner’s article is that, bluntly, speech recognition is a failed technology, and possibly an impractical one for the foreseeable future. Despite 40 years or so of research, despite Google releasing a corpus of a trillion words to feed to recognition engines, speech recognition accuracy has more or less topped out at 80%, and stalled there for over a decade. No really serious research seems to be ongoing either into existing approaches or into completely new ones. The longstanding belief that, if we could teach computers language, that would lead to AI, is being turned on its head, with some people now certain that, without true AI, computers will never really understand language.

It’s a disappointing conclusion, but one that I can’t really disagree with. Continue Reading »

Since my friend Richard was kind enough to refer people my way before writing his well-thought out refutation of my iPad/Star Trek article, it’s only fair that I refer you back to said refutation.

[Original article]

Several of you have pointed out to me that I’m not the only one who has noticed the resemblance between Apple’s impending device and Star Trek‘s ubiquitous portable data thingummies. Gizmodo points out there will be an app for that…

Star Trek is, of course, a world full of ubiquitous computing, although it’s rarely portrayed in those terms exactly. We see communicators, tricorders, flat-panel displays everywhere…and, for portable information access and messaging, the PADD.

Of course, these are really all just non-functional props. But the ideas behind them have long-since fired the imagination of real-world engineers. Communicators have already completely infiltrated our real-world lives–we call them cellphones. Flat panel displays are now so common it’s getting hard to remember when televisions took up significant cubic volume and not just rectangular area. Tricorders…well, we’ve got a way to go on that one, because we’re nowhere near the necessary technology for that kind of magical scanning. But they’re working on it.

PADDs, however, are in reach of our real-world technology, and the iPad seems to be consciously trying to make them a reality. The way PADDs have been portrayed, even as far back as Classic Trek¹ gives us some insight, I believe, into how Apple envisions the iPad being used.

Continue Reading »

For those of you who have been living in a Google-proof shelter this week, Google introduced its latest toy, Buzz, this week. Superficially, Buzz operates a lot like Twitter, or like Facebook’s status page, in that you’re encouraged to share your fleeting thoughts with your crowd.

However, in my opinion, it so far has several significant advantages over either Twitter or Facebook. Enough so that it’s already looking like it might overtake both for me, personally, as my preferred source and sink of “short-form” communication. I also think that it scores big over Google’s other collaborative experiment, Wave.

Read on for my pros and cons… To be explicit, in each section, “Advantage” and “Disadvantage” below all are from Buzz’s point of view.

Continue Reading »

I have a number of fellow geek friends who are deeply distressed by the current trend in computerized gadgetry, in particular, the iPhone and the much rumoured, but, as of this writing, still entirely vapourware Apple tablet device.

Myself, I think it’s pretty much where the industry’s been heading since the day the first truly retail home computers hit the market, and more to the point, I think it’s exactly what they should be doing.

Continue Reading »